Advances in Argumentation-Based Negotiation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) is a prevailing approach for automated negotiation. It is based on the exchange of arguments that allow an agent to acquire additional information about the other agents and the particular circumstances of the negotiation, and can be used for attacking or justifying offers. This is an important element in resolving conflicts that very often are due to the assumptions agents have made when making decisions and which may be found to be false in the course of the negotiation. Argumentation-based negotiation can be characterized in terms of three main topics, namely a) the reasoning mechanisms the agents use for negotiating and which are based on argumentation, b) the protocols the agents use for conveying arguments and offers and, c) the strategies that determine their choices at each step of the negotiation. This chapter presents argumentationbased negotiation by discussing representative works dealing with these three topics.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Argumentation- and Proposal-Based Negotiation
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentation-based negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for c...
متن کاملUsing Personality Types to Support Argumentation
Despite the advances in argumentation on group decision negotiation there is a need to simulate and identify the personality of participants. To make participants’ agents more human-like and to increase their flexibility in the negotiation process in group decision-making, the authors investigated the role of personality behaviours of participants applied to the conflict style theme. The negoti...
متن کاملA formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
This paper proposes an abstract framework for argumentation-based negotiation in which the impact of exchanging arguments on agents’ theories is formally described, the different types of solutions in negotiation are investigated, and the added value of argumentation in negotiation dialogues is analyzed. We study when, how and to which extent an exchange of arguments can be beneficial in negoti...
متن کاملContract - based Negotiation via Argumentation (
Negotiation is often described as the process by which agents come to a mutually acceptable agreement about some subject. This deenition is quite broad, as this process can be viewed from many diierent angles. Here we consider negotiation from the perspective of contracts. We present a general model of contract-based negotiation and propose a logic programming-based argumentation framework to c...
متن کاملArgumentation- vs. Proposal-Based Negotiation: An Empirical Case Study on the Basis of Game-Theoretic Solution Concepts
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentationbased negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for co...
متن کامل